So, frequent updates: cat-vacuuming or not?
Cigarettes: Was bad - I seem to be allowing myself to have two when in the pub. The question is, can I actually restrict myself to just the two when I'm in 'for the duration' and not dashing off? And I've still not tested how easy resistance is when doing the hang-around for hours waiting for Rock Steady work to start. I should be doing that today, as there's a game at each of Easter Road and Tynecsastle, and then Rugby at Murrayfield later on, but I'm still bashing away at the report (hence the cat-vac break).
Diary update: spent about an hour on the phone to stepdad in Norn Iron last night trying to sort out his PC. Started with his wifi not working, then the original broadband didn't (but the laptop was still getting 5Mbits/second from a neighbour's machine). Was about to get onto basic computer hygiene 101 when his cordless mouse died. Tried all sorts of things, none of which worked, so just had brief call explaining the procedure that sorted it:
- Remove mouse's USB connector from PC
- Reboot, let pc notice lack of mouse, and shut down
- Replace mouse
- Restart....
Anyway, here's a poll:
[Poll #647434]
From:
no subject
Regarding cat-vaccuuming, don't cats get irate if you use a vaccuum cleaner on them? I've known cats that wouldn't go near the thing as soon as it was turned on.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
But seriously I also have an A level in physics and it is completely over the top of my head. If only I lived in the 19th century, then I would have a chance of understanding the subject, i.e. no quantum mechanics, no relativity, no extra dimensions, etc.
From:
no subject
BTW - if you are concerned abt. how many ciggies you go through at the pub, just not puff on them as much. Half the fun of them is having something to do with your hands and having an entree to strike up a conversation ("Got a match?"). So, just hold the burning cheroot and don't smoke it. Easy for me to say, tho. Haven't smoked in years.
From:
Well it may work but...
I have seen other articles over time that hint at a charge to energy relationship and hence a charge to mass relationship so this may have some truth to it.
What also makes me have more faith in it is the part of Heim's formulae that calculated the mass of a particle starting with other physical characteristics, such as charge and angular momentum, within the accuracy of experimental error. This is something no one else in the field physics has managed. This means to me that there maybe more to this theory other than wishful thinking.
The stuff about entering space with different laws is where the serious bullshitometer starts flashing in that article.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
I really hate people jumping the gun like this. I just want to tell them, "Test the physics then get back to me."
From:
no subject
From:
Re: Well it may work but...