I'm with you on this. I'm happy to see tweets on LJ but don't want to click a cut to read them. If they're behind a cut I probably won't read them at all.
I really don't get why people are so anti tweets-on-LJ. Either they're interesting, in which case being tweets shouldn't matter, or they're boring, in which case the person's whole journal is probably boring and I'll be skipping it anyway. If an original-to-LJ post consisted of short statements each less than 140 characters no-one would be complaining. Why should the fact that they've been already posted elsewhere suddenly make them abhorrent?
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2009-04-21 10:48 am (UTC)I really don't get why people are so anti tweets-on-LJ. Either they're interesting, in which case being tweets shouldn't matter, or they're boring, in which case the person's whole journal is probably boring and I'll be skipping it anyway. If an original-to-LJ post consisted of short statements each less than 140 characters no-one would be complaining. Why should the fact that they've been already posted elsewhere suddenly make them abhorrent?