According to the Guardian, Britain and America are trying to weasel out of their obligation to tidy up after themselves. After all, why should they bother clearing up any cluster bombs they may have inadvertantly left behind in places like Iraq or Afghanistan - if the Iraqi/Afghan people didn't want blown to bits, they should've done what they were told.

I'm not really surprised, to be honest, but wasn't getting rid of landmines and similar part of our once-vaunted ethical foreign policy?

From: [identity profile] ophelia-complex.livejournal.com


It was - but they really don't give a shit and ethical foreign policies sound good on paper and bring in the votes, but are abandoned if they're too much trouble or expense. I can't stand politicians - deep mistrust.

From: [identity profile] ophelia-complex.livejournal.com

Re:


She wasn't a politician, although i see what you mean. I think she genuinely tried to help, but then she didn't dictate or influence the goverments foreign policy.

From: [identity profile] skx.livejournal.com


But she was my icon .. and she's practically a saint, and ... and ... and ...


From: [identity profile] ophelia-complex.livejournal.com

Re:


I quite liked her, she did pretty much what she could (not being a cabinet member and all that) although i'm sure people will comment saying she could've sold her jewellery or a corgi or something to feed starving people somewhere.

From: [identity profile] yonmei.livejournal.com


...what ethical foreign policy?

(I stopped believing in that before the end of 1997, to be honest - about when Robin Cook, then Foreign Secretary, announced that the UK would be selling yet more planes to the Indonesians so that they could use them against the East Timorese.)

From: [identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/la_marquise_de_/

Re: chez sweet chez.


Doesn't 'ethical foreign policy 'translate to 'nice noise, as long as it doesn't cost anything'? And I guess Bush wouldn'twant to be shown up, either... Bah! as M. D'Artagnan would say.
.